Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:25:48 +0200
with message-id <20170421092548.imqy4iw5ukvce...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#860693: ruby-rspec: FTBFS on i386: ERROR: Test
"ruby2.3" failed: Failure/Error: expect(output).to
match(/\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/)
has caused the Debian Bug report #860693,
regarding ruby-rspec: FTBFS on i386: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed:
Failure/Error: expect(output).to match(/\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
860693: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860693
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-rspec
Version: 3.5.0c3e0m0s0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: expect(output).to
> match(/\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/)
>
> expected "#<BasicObject:0x..fffff90f3710>" to match
> /\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/
> Diff:
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -/\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/
> +"#<BasicObject:0x..fffff90f3710>"
> # ./spec/rspec/support/object_formatter_spec.rb:191:in `block (3 levels)
> in <module:Support>'
> # debian/ruby-tests.rb:30:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
> # debian/ruby-tests.rb:24:in `chdir'
> # debian/ruby-tests.rb:24:in `block (2 levels) in <main>'
> # debian/ruby-tests.rb:23:in `fork'
> # debian/ruby-tests.rb:23:in `block in <main>'
> # debian/ruby-tests.rb:22:in `each'
> # debian/ruby-tests.rb:22:in `<main>'
>
> Finished in 0.98638 seconds (files took 0.49044 seconds to load)
> 458 examples, 1 failure, 2 pending
>
> Failed examples:
>
> rspec ./spec/rspec/support/object_formatter_spec.rb:190 #
> RSpec::Support::ObjectFormatter.format with an object that does not respond
> to #inspect such as BasicObject produces an output emulating MRI's
> #inspect-like output generated by C implementation
>
> Randomized with seed 4285
>
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed:
The full build log is available from:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/04/18/ruby-rspec_3.5.0c3e0m0s0-1_testing-i386.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 19/04/17 at 09:21 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ruby-rspec
> Version: 3.5.0c3e0m0s0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
> sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > Failure/Error: expect(output).to
> > match(/\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/)
> >
> > expected "#<BasicObject:0x..fffff90f3710>" to match
> > /\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/
> > Diff:
> > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> > -/\A#<BasicObject:0x[0-9a-f]{14}>\z/
> > +"#<BasicObject:0x..fffff90f3710>"
> > # ./spec/rspec/support/object_formatter_spec.rb:191:in `block (3
> > levels) in <module:Support>'
> > # debian/ruby-tests.rb:30:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
> > # debian/ruby-tests.rb:24:in `chdir'
> > # debian/ruby-tests.rb:24:in `block (2 levels) in <main>'
> > # debian/ruby-tests.rb:23:in `fork'
> > # debian/ruby-tests.rb:23:in `block in <main>'
> > # debian/ruby-tests.rb:22:in `each'
> > # debian/ruby-tests.rb:22:in `<main>'
> >
> > Finished in 0.98638 seconds (files took 0.49044 seconds to load)
> > 458 examples, 1 failure, 2 pending
> >
> > Failed examples:
> >
> > rspec ./spec/rspec/support/object_formatter_spec.rb:190 #
> > RSpec::Support::ObjectFormatter.format with an object that does not respond
> > to #inspect such as BasicObject produces an output emulating MRI's
> > #inspect-like output generated by C implementation
> >
> > Randomized with seed 4285
> >
> > ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed:
>
> The full build log is available from:
>
> http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/04/18/ruby-rspec_3.5.0c3e0m0s0-1_testing-i386.log
Hi,
I did the archive rebuild that resulted in this bug on a machine with a
jessie kernel. I did another rebuild on a machine with a stretch
kernel, and this failure disappeared.
My best guess is that this has something to do with a stack overflow,
in a way similar to #750593 (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750593#157 and #797530
(fixed in stretch, not jessie).
Given that this doesn't affect building on a machine with a stretch
kernel, I'm closing the bug.
Lucas
--- End Message ---
