Antonio Terceiro: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:26:00PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: >>[...] > > Nope. That was actually done after the current upstream release that we > have in Debian, actually tyring to _fix_ the issue. The actual fix comes > a little later in > https://github.com/knu/ruby-unf_ext/commit/8a6a735b51ef903200fc541112e35b7cea781856 > > I even proposed to revert that: > https://github.com/knu/ruby-unf_ext/pull/27 > > Upstream seems to be cooking a new release, to be released at any time > now I assume. With or without that special case for ARM, the code buids > OK under ppc64el. > > I will probably upload that, since the resulting upstream diff looks > quite unproblematic (if they accept my proposal, the chunk for > ext/unf_ext/extconf.rb will disappear from the final diff): > > [...] >
Great, thanks for following up. :) I am looking forward to hearing about upstream's take on it and seeing the fix in stretch. :) Thanks, ~Niels
