Ilias Tsitsimpis <i.tsitsim...@gmail.com> (2017-04-04): > Control: fixed -1 6.6.0~rc3+dfsg1-1 > > Hi Cyril, > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:28AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Looking at the code, it seems “is that older than maxage?” is > > implemented by looking at the timestamp in the filename for local > > mails, which happens to be October 2016 for a mail received in 2015! > > Your analysis is correct. Here is a blog post which explains in depth > the above bug: > > http://www.offlineimap.org/devel/2015/04/14/why-we-changed-maxage.html
Yes I've read this. > This should be fixed in newer versions of OfflineIMAP. Could you please > give it a try? Well, trying out new versions is something I can do, but it really doesn't help with the fact that offlineimap in stable is responsible for data loss. > You may also be interested in the 'sync_deletes' feature, introduced in > version 7.0.6+dfsg1-1. Copying from the docs: > > This option stands in the [Repository RemoteExample] section. > > Propagate deletions from remote to local. Messages deleted in this > repository > won't get deleted on the local repository if set to "no". Default is yes. This looks like an ideal solution to my initial problem, thanks! KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
