2017-03-31 18:38 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:24:46PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> 2017-03-31 18:16 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>:
>> > If I understand the situation correctly:
>> >
>> > 1. The only known RC issue here is that terminix frequently (but not
>> > always)
>> > FTBFS on armhf, and
>> > 2. no other package or architecture is known to be affected, and
>> > 3. looking at the upstream bug the root cause might not be found soon.
>> >
>> > What about making terminix in stretch
>> > Architecture: any [!armhf]
>> >
>> > This would be the smallest possible removal to cover the RC part of this
>> > bug for stretch.
>>
>> This bug doesn't affect the Terminix in Stretch...
>>...
>
> How did you come to this conclusion?
>
> Before writing my suggestion I did try to build terminix 1.3.0-5
> in a stretch_armhf chroot on harris, and it did fail the same way.
Oh? That's news to me, and actually pretty good to know - and pretty bad...
I compiled it fine a while back (with the same compiler version), and
the issue popped up with a bugfix release upload in Sid, so I assumed
Terminix would still build fine on armhf in Stretch.
Weird.
Cheers,
Matthias
--
Debian Developer | Freedesktop-Developer
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/
