On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:33:37AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi Dirk and Salvatore,
> 
> > From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>
> > On 11 March 2017 at 17:56, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > | 
> > | The relevant changes seem to be the following, but I might be mistaken. 
> > (btw,
> > | is there a VCS repository for r-base or does upstream not share 
> > development
> > | VCS?)
> > 
> > They do at svn.r-project.org  -- but that isn't browsable -- and the
> > community has a mirror here https://github.com/wch/r-source
> 
> Actually there is anonymous access:
> 
>       $ svn log https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/ | head
>       ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>       r72357 | luke | 2017-03-16 04:32:54 +0900 (jeu. 16 mars 2017) | 4 lignes
> 
>       Use two uniforms in sample() for higher precision when the uniform
>       generator is one of the Knuth generators or a user-defined generator
>       and the population size is at least 2^25.
> 
>       ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>       r72356 | luke | 2017-03-16 03:58:45 +0900 (jeu. 16 mars 2017) | 2 lignes
> 
> But the GitHub mirror is likely to be more convenient 

Thanks a lot to both for the information about that! I did not found
initially when trying to deduce what changes were done for the CVE.
Thanks, really appreciated.

> 
> > | Can you as well please make sure with the release team that the fix might 
> > enter
> > | for stretch?
> > 
> > How would I do that?  Suggest current upstream 3.3.3 to be passed down, or
> > prepare a 'testing-security' upload?
> 
> Actually, I see 3.3.3 in testing already.

Yep, apparently in this case was hint'ed without a explicit unblock
request. For reference:
https://release.debian.org/stretch/freeze_policy.html

Does this help?

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to