"Trent W. Buck" <trentb...@gmail.com> writes: > Stretch currently has both emacs24 and emacs25, > so is there any major downside to removing emacs24 from Stretch?
I think it would be fairly straightforward, though it might still require a bit of work to fix the few reverse deps that dak didn't catch, but Sean and I are now quite familiar with that process -- unless of course the reverse deps just aren't compatible with 25. FWIW, I'd probably be able to make/spend a good bit of time on this over the next few weeks if it's actually still a possibility. I'm fairly certain that would be more effort now in exchange for *much* less effort over the next year or two for any number of people. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
