On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > So you are installing something over an existing symlink in stretch ...
Yeah, I know. > ==> Please make libreoffice-dev-doc ship its content in > /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-core/sdk instead of > /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dev/sdk > (you may adjust the /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dev-doc/api link as well) > > ==> and have libreoffice-dev Conflicts: libreoffice-dev-doc (<< 1:5.2.5-2~) > (the dir_to_symlink part should be fine as is, maybe bump the version to > 1:5.2.5-2~, too) [...] > libreoffice-dev.preinst: d-m-h goes fine, no problematic files are found > (-dev-doc was removed temporarily) > libreoffice-dev.postinst: d-m-h suddenly finds newly owned files below > /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dev/ and explodes I guessed that too but I didn't get why; given it apparently should know which files to handled after the preinst call where there were no files. Ah, well. :) > So, yes, shipping directly in /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-core/sdk should do > the trick Changing the complete path during a hard freeze? Hmm. *If* I did change the path, I don't like /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-core/sdk at all. There's nothing -core'ish here. It's the SDK docs. /usr/share/doc/libreoffice/sdk would also be possible AFAICS since it's no symlink and has (afaicr) never been used for the docs. Regards, Rene > > > Andreas