On 31/01/17 09:36, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-01-31 00:41:57)
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:01:38 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
>>> Source: raptor
>>> Severity: serious
>>>
>>> Raptor 1.x has not had an upstream release in 6 years, is superceded by
>>> Raptor 2.x, and since earlier today no other package depend on it.
>>
>> Looks like you're wrong:
>>
>> emilio@tatooine:~$ dak rm -Rn -s testing raptor
>> Will remove the following packages from testing:
>>
>> libraptor1 |  1.4.21-11 | mips64el
>> libraptor1 | 1.4.21-11+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el
>> libraptor1 | 1.4.21-11+b2 | mips, mipsel, s390x
>> libraptor1-dbg |  1.4.21-11 | mips64el
>> libraptor1-dbg | 1.4.21-11+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el
>> libraptor1-dbg | 1.4.21-11+b2 | mips, mipsel, s390x
>> libraptor1-dev |  1.4.21-11 | mips64el
>> libraptor1-dev | 1.4.21-11+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el
>> libraptor1-dev | 1.4.21-11+b2 | mips, mipsel, s390x
>> libraptor1-doc |  1.4.21-11 | all
>>     raptor |  1.4.21-11 | source
>> raptor-utils |  1.4.21-11 | mips64el
>> raptor-utils | 1.4.21-11+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el
>> raptor-utils | 1.4.21-11+b2 | mips, mipsel, s390x
>>
>> Maintainer: Dave Beckett <daj...@debian.org>
>>
>> ------------------- Reason -------------------
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Checking reverse dependencies...
>> # Broken Depends:
>> flickcurl: libflickcurl-dev
>>
>> # Broken Build-Depends:
>> soprano: libraptor1-dev (>= 1.4.16)
>>
>> Dependency problem found.
> 
> Ah, indeed I missed some.
> 
> Since we are now past freeze, it seems raptor 1.x will bitrot another 
> few years - unless someone else does the work of getting those few 
> remaining packages relinked (likely needs very small patches) and 
> negotiate with release managers to let those changes through (too big a 
> mental challenge for me).

If the changes are not too invasive and happen soon, I will strongly consider 
it.

Cheers,
Emilio

Reply via email to