On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 15:50:38 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/01/17 at 11:06 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > If my understanding of TSX (as discussed with the Cambridge BSP) is
> > correct, this is not release-critical for stretch [...]
> > so I'm tagging it buster,sid with release team approval (jmw).
>
> In my latest archive rebuild, libmicrohttpd 0.9.51-1 built fine on a
> TSX-enabled machine with libc6_2.24-9. So yes, this is "fixed" in sid.
Thanks. Do you have a list or usertag for FTBFSs that were only reproducible
when TSX was turned on, so we can tag them +buster,+sid,-stretch with
similar reasoning?
S
