Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:40:57 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354229: lastfmsubmitd: man pages misplaced (and
uncompressed)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lastfmsubmitd
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1; 12.1
lastfmsubmitd's actual man pages seem to have wound up in
/usr/share/man1 rather than /usr/share/man/man1 (which consequently
now contains dangling symlinks that called my attention to the
problem.) Presumably as a result of this, they're also uncompressed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'sarge-unsupported')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages lastfmsubmitd depends on:
ii adduser 3.84 Add and remove users and groups
ii python 2.3.5-5 An interactive high-level object-o
Versions of packages lastfmsubmitd recommends:
ii python-mpdclient 0.11.1-1 Python interface to MPD
ii python-musicbrainz 2.1.2-2 Second generation incarnation of t
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lastfmsubmitd
Version: 0.22-1
Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aaron M. Ucko writes:
>
>> I see two uploads from yesterday, of 0.19-1 and 0.20-1, both in time
>> for dinstall. In looking at the latter, I see that its setup.py omits
>> the relevant path component.
>
> Er, sorry, I meant 0.22 which is subsequent to 0.20 and still in the
> queue at the moment.
Ah, yeah, now it's shown up, and indeed places the man pages correctly.
Thanks!
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--- End Message ---