Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:10:27 +0000
with message-id <e1cupat-0008dn...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#851828: fixed in oclgrind 16.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #851828,
regarding oclgrind FTBFS on armhf: test failures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
851828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: oclgrind
Version: 16.10-1
Severity: serious

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=oclgrind&arch=armhf&ver=16.10-1&stamp=1484675768&raw=0

...
      Start 75: uninitialized/uninitialized_local_array
      Start 76: uninitialized/uninitialized_local_ptr
73/86 Test #76: uninitialized/uninitialized_local_ptr 
.....................***Failed    0.15 sec
Running test with optimisations
Test returned non-zero value (-7)
FAILED

74/86 Test #74: uninitialized/uninitialized_address .......................   
Passed    0.36 sec
      Start 77: uninitialized/uninitialized_local_variable
      Start 78: uninitialized/uninitialized_packed_struct_memcpy
75/86 Test #75: uninitialized/uninitialized_local_array 
...................***Failed    0.27 sec
Running test with optimisations
Test returned non-zero value (-7)
FAILED

      Start 79: uninitialized/uninitialized_padded_struct_memcpy
76/86 Test #77: uninitialized/uninitialized_local_variable ................   
Passed    0.42 sec
77/86 Test #78: uninitialized/uninitialized_packed_struct_memcpy ..........   
Passed    0.41 sec
      Start 80: uninitialized/uninitialized_padded_nested_struct_memcpy
      Start 81: uninitialized/uninitialized_private_array
78/86 Test #79: uninitialized/uninitialized_padded_struct_memcpy ..........   
Passed    0.31 sec
79/86 Test #81: uninitialized/uninitialized_private_array 
.................***Failed    0.17 sec
Running test with optimisations
Test returned non-zero value (-7)
FAILED

      Start 82: wait_event/wait_event_chained
      Start 83: wait_event/wait_event_divergent
80/86 Test #80: uninitialized/uninitialized_padded_nested_struct_memcpy ...   
Passed    0.28 sec
      Start 84: wait_event/wait_event_duplicates
81/86 Test #83: wait_event/wait_event_divergent ...........................   
Passed    0.31 sec
82/86 Test #82: wait_event/wait_event_chained .............................   
Passed    0.41 sec
      Start 85: wait_event/wait_event_invalid
      Start 86: rt_map_buffer
83/86 Test #84: wait_event/wait_event_duplicates ..........................   
Passed    0.31 sec
84/86 Test #86: rt_map_buffer .............................................   
Passed    0.31 sec
85/86 Test #85: wait_event/wait_event_invalid .............................   
Passed    0.31 sec
86/86 Test #32: bugs/many_alloca ..........................................   
Passed   30.88 sec

97% tests passed, 3 tests failed out of 86

Total Test time (real) =  34.03 sec

The following tests FAILED:
         75 - uninitialized/uninitialized_local_array (Failed)
         76 - uninitialized/uninitialized_local_ptr (Failed)
         81 - uninitialized/uninitialized_private_array (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
Makefile:109: recipe for target 'test' failed
make[1]: *** [test] Error 8

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: oclgrind
Source-Version: 16.10-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
oclgrind, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 851...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Price <j.pr...@bristol.ac.uk> (supplier of updated oclgrind package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:05:47 +0000
Source: oclgrind
Binary: liboclgrind-16.10 liboclgrind-dev oclgrind
Architecture: source
Version: 16.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OpenCL Maintainers <pkg-opencl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: James Price <j.pr...@bristol.ac.uk>
Description:
 liboclgrind-16.10 - core library for Oclgrind
 liboclgrind-dev - development files for Oclgrind
 oclgrind   - OpenCL device simulator
Closes: 851828
Changes:
 oclgrind (16.10-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix armhf test failures (Closes: #851828)
   * Fix test failures on big-endian systems
Checksums-Sha1:
 428671b2e0d8359b923ed0e982d0ebc01d2d16f4 2199 oclgrind_16.10-2.dsc
 986ee068f2be36cf1865a5d56129760b36a06e8a 7752 oclgrind_16.10-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 516e960f1dedf620ca9fcc6dde3c4dc7a6a5f0e47c088a06f81b903e37ef450e 2199 
oclgrind_16.10-2.dsc
 697104748c7986818ca7f3e05785228f1d4b0d84508fd5ecf6ece6218401eb69 7752 
oclgrind_16.10-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 793dfd1402c7910ece5457ee74a9a073 2199 devel optional oclgrind_16.10-2.dsc
 8245deddd656d8231265d978a8675c77 7752 devel optional 
oclgrind_16.10-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=E0kS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to