Package: wl
Version: 2.15.9+0.20141019-4
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: required

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Distributor ID: Kali
Description:    Kali GNU/Linux Rolling
Release:        kali-rolling
Codename:       kali-rolling
Architecture: x86_64

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-kali1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages wl depends on:
ii  apel               10.8+0.20120427-15
ii  dpkg               1.18.10
ii  emacs              46.1
ii  emacs24 [emacsen]  24.5+1-7.1
ii  emacsen-common     2.0.8
ii  flim               1:1.14.9+0.20120428-16
ii  semi               1.14.7~0.20120428-20

wl recommends no packages.

Versions of packages wl suggests:
pn  bbdb                                  <none>
pn  bitmap-mule                           <none>
pn  bogofilter | bsfilter | spamassassin  <none>
pn  easypg                                <none>
ii  gnupg                                 1.4.20-6
pn  gnutls-bin                            <none>
pn  im                                    <none>
pn  maildir-utils                         <none>
pn  mhc                                   <none>
pn  mu-cite                               <none>
pn  mule-ucs                              <none>
pn  namazu2                               <none>
pn  notmuch                               <none>
ii  openssl                               1.0.2h-1
pn  starttls                              <none>
pn  w3m-el                                <none>
pn  x-face-el                             <none>

-- no debconf information

Reply via email to