Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2016 16:51:36 -0200
with message-id
<CABwkT9rJfgObcze3C=c36ocxz7t1d7dwaqrzum1-ceoe0wu...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828287: dsniff: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #828287,
regarding dsniff: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
828287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dsniff
Version: 2.4b1+debian-22.1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/dsniff_2.4b1+debian-22.1_amd64-20160529-1415
On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail. There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.
There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.
If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
Kurt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
It looks like there's a typo on the changelog which didn't trigger the
closing of this bug, see:
* Add 24_Fix-OpenSSL1.1.0-Build.patch.
*Thanks to Christoph Biedl. Closes (#828287)*
* Bump to dh compat level 10
It should be something like "(closes: #828287)".
Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
--- End Message ---
