On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 11:35 +0000, Wookey wrote: [...] > So I'm really not sure whether one should mark this bug as applying to > 2.0.4.
Right. > Can we get laujit 2.1-with-arm64-support into unstable for stretch? > There are serious people that would really like to see that (because > important stuff like nginx need luajit), but presumably the transition > freeze applies here? They both build libluajit-5.1-2 so I don't see that there's any transition needed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Logic doesn't apply to the real world. - Marvin Minsky
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
