Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:34:40 +0000
with message-id <e1cbfkg-000dac...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#844421: fixed in rpmlint 1.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #844421,
regarding rpmlint: FTBFS (failing tests)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
844421: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844421
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:rpmlint
Version: 1.9-4
Severity: serious

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with python2
   dh_testdir -i
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_auto_configure -i
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
rm -f __version__.py
rm -f __isocodes__.py
ISO_3166_1_URL="file:///usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_3166-1.json" \
ISO_639_3_URL="file:///usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_639-3.json" \
dh_auto_build
        make -j1

[... snipped ...]

test/test_scl.py::TestSCLBinary::test_scl_name_screwed_up PASSED
test/test_scl.py::TestSCLBinary::test_scl_forbidden_folders PASSED
test/test_scl.py::TestSCLBinary::test_scl_macros_outside_of_build PASSED

========================== 30 passed in 7.59 seconds ===========================
flake8 tests
./Config.py:84:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./Config.py:98:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./Config.py:112:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./Config.py:133:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./Config.py:143:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./PostCheck.py:194:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./FilesCheck.py:314:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./FilesCheck.py:1003:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./ConfigCheck.py:33:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./BinariesCheck.py:282:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./BinariesCheck.py:554:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./SignatureCheck.py:41:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./Pkg.py:69:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, 
found 1
./Pkg.py:144:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, 
found 1
./Pkg.py:198:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, 
found 1
./RpmFileCheck.py:37:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./PamCheck.py:31:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./AbstractCheck.py:108:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./SpecCheck.py:40:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./SpecCheck.py:610:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./ZipCheck.py:26:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./NamingPolicyCheck.py:72:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or 
function definition, found 1
./LSBCheck.py:43:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./I18NCheck.py:161:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./FHSCheck.py:53:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./MenuXDGCheck.py:66:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./SourceCheck.py:46:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./test/test.SpecCheck.py:34:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or 
function definition, found 1
./test/test.SpecCheck2.py:20:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or 
function definition, found 1
./test/test.Pkg.py:33:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function 
definition, found 1
./test/test.SpecCheck3.py:20:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or 
function definition, found 1
./test/test.PamCheck.py:25:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or 
function definition, found 1
Makefile:60: recipe for target 'check' failed
make[2]: *** [check] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
debian/rules:18: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
debian/rules:21: recipe for target 'build-indep' failed
make: *** [build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep gave error exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The relevant part of the build log is included above.

I'm building on stretch.
This started failing for me on 2016-11-14.
Before 2016-11-08, it built ok:

[...]
Status: successful  rpmlint_1.9-4_amd64-20161108T145316Z
Status: failed      rpmlint_1.9-4_amd64-20161114T151128Z
[...]

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and 
affects,
so that this is still visible in the page for this package.

Thanks.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rpmlint
Source-Version: 1.9-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rpmlint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 844...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> (supplier of updated rpmlint 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:05:32 +0100
Source: rpmlint
Binary: rpmlint
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: RPM packaging team <pkg-rpm-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org>
Description:
 rpmlint    - RPM package checker
Closes: 841725 844421
Changes:
 rpmlint (1.9-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Evgeni Golov ]
   * [7951e47] rpmlint: fix bash-completion installing into wrong directory
     (Closes: #841725)
 .
   [ Arturo Borrero Gonzalez ]
   * [3acdf65] d/: run wrap-and-sort
   * [1a00af4] rpmlint: disable tests at build time (Closes: #844421)
Checksums-Sha1:
 1367102f561585bdd181c131c0c4758912bab482 2118 rpmlint_1.9-5.dsc
 b75bde9c8f440c1ef943ded0fd5381a0e4eb30d5 4632 rpmlint_1.9-5.debian.tar.xz
 362beaf8ab9521eb8a25733a706438a3940cf93d 85600 rpmlint_1.9-5_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 fa7f4b0eaa4362c3020f3af5a2ff2f190a371a0bd1e2e8e396dfe110830587b3 2118 
rpmlint_1.9-5.dsc
 761c437b5f1ffdff17f7d388081fddc99807d12d13fa36835060c547f8440d3a 4632 
rpmlint_1.9-5.debian.tar.xz
 e2a9743cf63de9824142ae47f154b411dba36f19b4cfc288382432fada424b64 85600 
rpmlint_1.9-5_all.deb
Files:
 82005b996cc5a2cc21c430393b57b1c5 2118 admin extra rpmlint_1.9-5.dsc
 1549ba375941850c3aee89c8689a6df6 4632 admin extra rpmlint_1.9-5.debian.tar.xz
 2e923fde28accf76d7e331f99f348171 85600 admin extra rpmlint_1.9-5_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=kSuX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to