Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:29:57 +0100
with message-id <1ddb8534-4caf-100f-24d2-a895eb186...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#843111: llvm-toolchain-3.7: FTBFS on i386
has caused the Debian Bug report #843111,
regarding llvm-toolchain-3.7: FTBFS on i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
843111: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843111
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: llvm-toolchain-3.7
Version: 1:3.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package failed to build on i386. We need llvm 3.7 in testing/stretch
for ghc 8 (then we can remove llvm 3.5), thus opening this bug.
Cheers,
Emilio
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental'), (650, 'testing'), (500,
'unstable-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf
Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:39:43 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> > Moving GHC 8 to LLVM 3.8 would be possible with some minor patches from
> > upstream, though the lack of LLVM 3.8 on armel would be a big problem. Also
> > I'm
> > not sure the GHC maintainers want to deviate from upstream on the LLVM
> > version.
> > But we can move to 3.7 and drop 3.5 for now, then after that has happened,
> > consider if we can move to 3.8 and what we do with armel.
> >
>
> what about shipping llvm 3.7 only for arch:all, arm64, armel and armhf?
> this way we can remove it from mostly everywhere and let it migrate without
> caring of i386 and amd64 anymore.
>
> Does this sound crazy?
It doesn't, but a give back fixed this. So this is no longer an issue.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
