Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 21:03:19 +0000
with message-id
<CAG4opy8nT11Y7m98jWM_m=nkrlu-3w9sjzl2eunk-bcrett...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #828618,
regarding zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
828618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zeroinstall-injector
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/zeroinstall-injector_2.10-2_amd64-20160530-2117
On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail. There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.
There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.
If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
Kurt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 26 June 2016 at 15:23, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote:
> block 828618 by 828462
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>>
>> I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it
>> when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed.
>
> So I've set that.
Just tested compiling 0install 2.12 on sid with "apt-get source
zeroinstall-injector --compile" and it worked and produced a binary
that runs with libssl.so.1.1, so closing.
--
talex5 (GitHub/Twitter) http://roscidus.com/blog/
GPG: 5DD5 8D70 899C 454A 966D 6A51 7513 3C8F 94F6 E0CC
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA
--- End Message ---
