Hi Lucas! Am 04.10.2016 um 12:56 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 04/10/16 at 12:13 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> severity 839444 serious >>> thanks >> [...] >>>> If you can reproduce the problem, please provide a backtrace from the >>>> segmentation fault. >>> >>> I can (on two different machines) >> >> ... but you still don't want to provide a backtrace? > > When I do archive rebuilds, I automatically retry failed builds on a > different machine. So, yes, the failure is (most likely) not random, and > reproducible. > > If you tried building it, and succeeded, why don't you post a build log, > then diff it with mine? Most likely, that will show a difference that > explains why the result is different. If it does not, then I'm willing > to restart all my rebuild setup and debug that. But I'd rather not do > that if it can be avoided by a cheaper plan.
Such (successful) build logs should be available from buildd.d.o afaics. They are quite recent [1]. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libgda5 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
