Andreas Beckmann writes: > On 2016-09-27 12:12, bret curtis wrote: >> To put it simply, upstream (OpenMW) has no plans to support GLESv2 at >> this time. Since OSG-3.4 for armhf is compiled only for GLESv2, this >> complicates things drastically and at this point I'm in over my head. > > IIRC, quite some packages have been removed from arm* over the last year > that require Desktop OpenGL and don't work with "just" GLES. > I just cannot remember (or find) concrete examples. > So openmw is probably another RM candidate. >
I agree with that. As far as I know, Desktop OpenGL is not usually hardware-accelerated on those SOC platforms, so having OpenMW available there would be a moot point. Regards, Alberto
