Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2016 02:27:10 +0200
with message-id <20160821002710.k7hqbnvenxf56...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#834911: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: FTBFS too much
often (Failed 2/12 test programs)
has caused the Debian Bug report #834911,
regarding libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: FTBFS too much often (Failed 2/12 test
programs)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
834911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
Version: 2.082
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with bash-completion
dh_testdir -i
dh_update_autotools_config -i
dh_auto_configure -i
perl Build.PL --installdirs vendor --config "optimize=-g -O2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" --config
"ld=x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,relro"
Can't find dist packages without a MANIFEST file
Run 'Build manifest' to generate one
WARNING: Possible missing or corrupt 'MANIFEST' file.
Nothing to enter for 'provides' field in metafile.
Created MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json
Creating new 'Build' script for 'Config-Model-Dpkg' version '2.057'
[... snipped ...]
ok 3 - __pack_files dir with several files
ok 4 - __pack_files dir with subdirs
ok 5 - __pack_files interspersed copyrights
1..5
ok
t/scanner/scan-copyright.t ...............
ok 1 - check open-nebula copyright
ok 2 - check sdl2 copyright
ok 3 - check pan copyright
ok 4 - check libtommath copyright
ok 5 - check moarvm-3rdparty-tinymt copyright
ok 6 - check moarvm copyright
ok 7 - check rakudo-star copyright
ok 8 - check test-783932 copyright
1..8
ok
t/scanner/squash_copyright_years.t .......
ok 1 - require Dpkg::Copyright::Scanner;
ok 2 - __squash_copyrights_years dir with squashable copyright
ok 3 - __squash_copyrights_years dir with squashable copyright checked new
copyright entries
1..3
ok
t/scanner/squash_files.t .................
ok 1 - require Dpkg::Copyright::Scanner;
ok 2 - __squash dir with one file
ok 3 - __squash dir with several files
ok 4 - __squash dir with subdirs
1..4
ok
t/scanner/squash_swap_copyright_years.t ..
ok 1 - require Dpkg::Copyright::Scanner;
ok 2 - __squash_copyrights_years dir with squashable copyright
1..2
ok
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/dependency-check.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 1 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
t/model_tests.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 2 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Files=12, Tests=88, 9 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.01 sys + 8.99 cusr 0.59
csys = 9.66 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 2/12 test programs. 0/88 subtests failed.
dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
debian/rules:13: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
debian/rules:6: recipe for target 'build-indep' failed
make: *** [build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep gave error exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because this source package only generates "Arch: all" packages, this
is the same as a FTBFS bug in the usual sense, and the fact that I was
doing "dpkg-buildpackage -A" does not mean anything special.
I attach three different failed build logs.
Thanks.
libconfig-model-dpkg-perl_2.082_amd64-20160819T104515Z.gz
Description: application/gzip
libconfig-model-dpkg-perl_2.082_amd64-20160818T215000Z.gz
Description: application/gzip
libconfig-model-dpkg-perl_2.082_amd64-20160818T193139Z.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:13:42 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > So I guess we can close this bug?
> > Either that, or reassign it to src:apt to track 1.3~rc2 testing migration
> > I guess.
> > I don't mind much, but maybe Santiago (cc'd) does? (given you seem to be
> > rebuilding stretch not sid)
> Yes, I am building on stretch, using (of course) packages also on stretch.
That's quite ... unusual.
> I don't mind that this bug is closed if it's really fixed, but from
> the point of view of Quality Assurance, please help me to determine
> how this bug reached testing in the first place and how we could have
> avoided it to happen in testing.
Cf. #833656
> For example, if it's really a bug in apt, then please do a reassign
> but ensure that the bug is serious (as it breaks other packages), and
> that it has an "affects" on this package.
It's a bug in lintian (#833656) caused by a change in apt which was
reverted.
Cheers,
gregor, closing the bug now
--
.''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Diana Krall: The Boulevard Of Broken Dreams
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
--- End Message ---
