On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:33:09 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Sorry, I don't understand the connection to building with -A. Is > > there a report about the package failing with it? Does it fail for > > you if you build with -A? > I only build with -A, but there are a lot of packages for which a > failed build with -A and a failed build without -A are essentially the > same thing.
Ok, thanks for the explanation. > > So you got a failing build? [...] > Yes, so far I got a failed build and three successful builds. > I attach the failed build. Thanks! > > (And on the reproducible builds it works roughly half of the time: > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/libdevel-gdb-perl.html > > ) > That's more or less my point: For a package which is "Arch: all" like > this one, a success rate of only 50% is bad enough not to be RC. Agreed -- in general; my point is that this 50% failure rate only occurs on the reproducible build setup and not on ci.debian.net or my machine (or anybody else's who tried to hunt this this annoying bug). Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Dawn Landes: Tired Of This Life
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
