Your message dated Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:47:40 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351097: elinks shows no content
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2006 19:57:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 02 11:57:30 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h082218134240.host.wavenet.at ([82.218.134.240])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F4ka9-0007oA-VE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:57:30 -0800
Received: from localhost (h082218014107.host.wavenet.at [82.218.14.107])
(authenticated bits=0)
by h082218134240.host.wavenet.at (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with
ESMTP id k12Jo9fh000488
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:50:12 +0100
Received: from gerhard by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1F4kW8-0003vp-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:53:20 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:53:20 +0100
From: gerhard oettl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: elinks shows no content
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Subject: elinks shows no content
Package: elinks
Version: 0.10.4-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Elinks only shows URI (upper right) and statusline: OK [-----]
but no content on one host. On other host it works fine.
What i discovered is that on the failing host the shared libs
are taken from /lib where the same libs on the working host
shows to /lib/tls (output from ldd).
If helpfull i also can send output from strace to compare the
working with the failing version.
Noticeable on the failing host are many lines like:
mmap2(...) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
old_mmap(...) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
that do not appear in the strace output of the working host.
thanks
gerhard
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.2.20-idepci
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages elinks depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-2 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libgpmg1 1.19.6-19sarge1 General Purpose Mouse - shared lib
ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii liblua50 5.0.2-5 Main interpreter library for the L
ii liblualib50 5.0.2-5 Extension library for the Lua 5.0
ii libperl5.8 5.8.4-8sarge3 Shared Perl library
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
--
.''`. gerhard oettl on Debian/Gnu Linux
: :' :
`. `'` gpg key: 1024D/D59131AA 2002-06-18
`-
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 351097-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2006 23:47:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 02 15:47:42 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F4oAw-0000AY-2N
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:47:42 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 27B252C001; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:47:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:47:40 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gerhard oettl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#351097: elinks shows no content
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="98e8jtXdkpgskNou"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--98e8jtXdkpgskNou
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:53:20PM +0100, gerhard oettl wrote:
> Subject: elinks shows no content
> Package: elinks
> Version: 0.10.4-7
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> Elinks only shows URI (upper right) and statusline: OK [-----]
> but no content on one host. On other host it works fine.
> What i discovered is that on the failing host the shared libs
> are taken from /lib where the same libs on the working host
> shows to /lib/tls (output from ldd).
> If helpfull i also can send output from strace to compare the
> working with the failing version.=20
> Noticeable on the failing host are many lines like:
> mmap2(...) =3D -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
> old_mmap(...) =3D -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> that do not appear in the strace output of the working host.
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.2.20-idepci
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes, 2.2 is not a supported kernel version in sarge. Please upgrade.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--98e8jtXdkpgskNou
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD4pocKN6ufymYLloRAjfDAKC1WLbCAx/LvB6C8bctvyHpTfP9SwCg0jhd
HTrlIogo8WNi3Ijx0qpTmIk=
=leWE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--98e8jtXdkpgskNou--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
