On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:40:47PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote: >>> Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I >>> probably >>> won't have time for it in the near future!
>> What's the correct patch to apply here? Build with -O instead of -O2, or >> to try the bugzilla patch provided by Lionel? >> I'll try to trick lool so we prepare a NMU in the next few days. > From what I read in the bugzilla bug-report it looks as if this is in > fact a gcc-4.0 bug. No, it is not only a gcc-4.0 bug. 1) The mozilla codebase has a pervasive aliasing rules violation problem, built in quite deep in the codebase. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11376#c18 and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11376#c38 . 2) GCC 4.0 had some aliasing-related bugs, but the ones that Mozilla bugzilla points at are (as far as I understand) solved in the current Debian gcc (4.0.2): http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22591 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23192 -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
