Your message dated Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:46:18 +0200 with message-id <58e61452-5c28-ff4d-e69c-7115e5bb0...@xs4all.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#833756: mapnik: FTBFS with gcc6/boost1.61/icu57 has caused the Debian Bug report #833756, regarding mapnik: FTBFS with gcc6/boost1.61/icu57 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 833756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833756 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---package: mapnik version: 3.0.11+ds-1 severity: serious Dear maintainer, your package failed to build on buildds during the transition to boost1.61 and icu57 using gcc6 as a compiler. you can see the failed build logs at https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mapnik&ver=3.0.11%2Bds-1%2Bb6&suite=sid -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---fixed 833756 mapnik/3.0.12~rc1+ds-1~exp1 thanks Hi Mattia, Thanks for caring about these transitions. I'm well aware of the mapnik build failure with Boost 1.61 as I've been following the transitions closely. Mapnik 3.0.12-rc1 has support for Boost 1.61 and is available in experimental along with the rest of the Mapnik family which needed to be rebuilt with Mapnik 3.0.12 (along with changes for the new Mapnik). I'm going to wait at least a week before moving the packages from experimental to unstable. Hopefully Mapnik 3.0.12 final will be released by then, along with a new node-mapnik that officially support 3.0.12. I prefer to not have pre-releases in unstable. Ubuntu as usual has not bothered to coordinate with the maintainers in Debian, and has already synced the updated Mapnik packages from experimental, which I think is premature. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---