The other (GnuTLS) bug has been closed.  I've included the relevant
Guile clone above.

Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes:

> Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> writes:
>
>> There are no source changes from -9 to -10 but the the compilation
>> options changed, the following options are present in -10 but missing
>> in -9:
>> -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security
>> So previous versions were built without -O2 and therefore without
>> HAVE_INLINE!
>>
>> Rebuilding -10 -with -O0 appended to CFLAGS make the issue
>> unreproducible, while it still shows up at -O1.
>
> I was preparing an upload that specifies -O0 universally for now, but
> realized I should check to see if we might know whether or not the
> problem is likely to be amd64 specific.  Do we?
>
> Thanks
> -- 
> Rob Browning
> rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
> GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
> GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Reply via email to