On sábado, 16 de julio de 2016 12:13:19 P. M. ART Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07/16/2016 03:43 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > On viernes, 15 de julio de 2016 10:36:27 P. M. ART Lisandro Damián Nicanor
> > Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > [snip]
> > 
> >> I really *love* them (I haven't used cme before, someday I'll need to
> >> investigate that one). Sadly I think applying them without the
> >> maintainer's
> >> approval it's a bad idea.
> > 
> > It is worth to note here that the last upload was marked as "Team upload"
> > because it was prepared by Gudjon and I while we where working towards
> > pushin qwt with qt5 support to unstable and I just coordinated with
> > Gudjon to do the upload.
> > 
> > I'm really not too interested in maintaining qwt myself, I just happen to
> > have another package that requires it too.
> 
> I'd like to see qwt properly team maintained, preferably within an
> existing team (Debian Science seems a good candidate) instead of using a
> single individual as Maintainer.
> 
> If that move it accompanied by the switch to git, I'm willing to be move
> structurally involved in qwt packaging because it's an important
> dependency of one of my packages too, although I also don't want to be
> the sole maintainer.
> 
> Gudjon, please consider a more formal team structure for the maintenance
> of the qwt package.

I agree, a team should be much better.

By the way I'll take care of the current FTBFSs, it seems we need some more 
symbols tweaking.


-- 
Dadme voto electrónico y con una terminal os haré presidente.
  el.machi

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to