Your message dated Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:12:52 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 22:55:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 14:55:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com ([195.54.107.73])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1ElwaC-0002to-94
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:55:48 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([213.67.209.69] [213.67.209.69])
          by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:55:16 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tore Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 
=?iso-8859-1?q?nfs-kernel-server=3A_NFS_client_cannot_detect_NFS_server_e?=
 =?iso-8859-1?q?xport=2C=0D=0Amounting_impossible?=
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:55:16 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.0.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

This is a refinement of bug report #335418, which has likely a connection
to other reports like #81428 and #292521.

Error reported at each attempt to mount a server export:
 mount: server:/expdir failed, reason given by server: Permission denied

Server syslog has no message, but the client syslog reports
 localhost mountd[4963]: refused mount request from server for /expdir (/):
no export entry

I believe that the client fails to detect the export and generates
an arbitrary "permission denied" error.

Legitimate questions: Are the computers connected? Is there any firewall
present? Answers: Ping communication is OK, and rpcinfo for the server may
be listed at the client, and for the client at the server. They are
directly connected via a regular switch, their iptables are empty, no
firewalling.

Further: Are required daemons running? Yes, both rpcinfo lists are fully
populated. Now, is expdir really exported? Yes, the exportfs command on the
server tells
 /expdir   client
since its /etc/exports file has the line
 /expdir   127.168.0.12(rw,no_root_squash,sync)
or, alternatively
 /expdir   client(rw,no_root_squash,sync)

The /etc/hosts file content on the server is
 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost server
 127.168.0.11 server 
 127.168.0.12 client
and, on the client,
 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost client
 127.168.0.11 server
 127.168.0.12 client

These two computers cannot be NFS-connected. The error remains and is
permanently repeatable even when the client-server roles are interchanged.

Additional information concerning exports handling on the server, shown
with a command sequence on the server immediatly after reboot:

> exportfs
/expdir   client
> exportfs -rav
exporting client:/expdir
reexporting client:/expdir to kernel
# (The empty xtab was now written with correct information)
# If 127.168.0.12 in /etc/exports is changed to the name (client)
# the above may be repeated with exactly equal result.
# Now if 127.168.0.12(rw,no_root_squash,sync) is changed to 
# 127.168.0.12/255.255.255.255(rw,no_root_squash,sync):
> exportfs -rav
exporting 127.168.0.12/255.255.255.255:/expdir
unexporting client:/expdir from kernel
# (Now xtab is cleared)
# Remove the netmask:
> exportfs -rav
exporting client:/expdir
exporting client:/expdir to kernel

Virtually the export does function, except when a netmask is applied, like
in bug report #292521. But the client cannot detect the server's export.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.59     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-8    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcomerr2                    1.38-2     common error description library
ii  libkrb53                      1.3.6-5    MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libnfsidmap1                  0.8-1      An nfs idmapping library
ii  libwrap0                      7.6.dbs-8  Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  nfs-common                    1:1.0.7-3  NFS support files common to client
ii  sysvinit                      2.86.ds1-4 System-V like init

nfs-kernel-server recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 343124-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2006 16:12:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 29 08:12:53 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lobefin.net ([82.71.90.98])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F3FAb-0000v5-Eu; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:12:53 -0800
Received: from lobefin.net ([82.71.90.97] helo=deepblue.lobefin.net)
        by mail.lobefin.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F3FAX-0000QH-TQ; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:12:49 +0000
Received: from steve by deepblue.lobefin.net with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1F3FAa-0005Y4-PI; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:12:52 +0000
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:12:52 +0000
From: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.4 
X-OS: Linux deepblue 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 x86_64
X-Uptime: 5:01
X-Latin: Hodie quarto Kalendas Februarias MMDCCLIX ab urbe condita est
X-Date: Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 29th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3172
X-DDate: Only 2430847 Shopping Days Left Before X-Day. This statement is false. 
X-Motto: debian/rules
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Authenticated-Sender: steve
X-Scanned-By: ClamAV 0.88/1257 on mail.lobefin.net; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:12:49 
+0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Submitter says it was a configuration problem, not a package problem.
Closing.
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to