> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Thibaut, > > On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène <vare...@debian.org> wrote: >> >>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: >>> >>> Control: tags 796612 + patch >>> Control: tags 796612 + pending >>> >>> Dear maintainer, >>> >>> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and >>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >>> should delay it longer. >> >> It’s ok, you do what you have to do. >> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining >> “upstream” here now: >> >> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ >> >> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. > > Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd.
It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch. > Why not upload > that version to debian? Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and at this point I don’t care anymore. Cheers, T.
