Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2006 04:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339119: fixed in iproute 20051007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 00:36:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 16:36:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de ([213.133.98.126])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ebono-0008SI-Mb
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:36:02 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ebonk-00048k-EO
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:35:56 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:35:55 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: iproute_20051007-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: iproute
Version: 20051007-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

You seem to miss a build-dependency on flex.

| Automatic build of iproute_20051007-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051114-0819
| ******************************************************************************
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading Package Lists...
| Building Dependency Tree...
| Need to get 390kB of source archives.
| Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main iproute 20051007-1 
(dsc) [784B]
| Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main iproute 20051007-1 
(tar) [371kB]
| Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main iproute 20051007-1 
(diff) [18.6kB]
| Fetched 390kB in 0s (2059kB/s)
| Download complete and in download only mode
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: tetex-bin,  libatm1-dev | atm-dev, bison, libdb4.2-dev | 
libdb-dev | libdb2-dev | libdb3-dev, linuxdoc-tools, tetex-extra, 
linux-kernel-headers, debhelper, lynx, dpatch
[...]
| make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/tc'
| flex  -oemp_ematch.lex.c emp_ematch.l
| make[2]: flex: Command not found
| make[2]: *** [emp_ematch.lex.c] Error 127
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/tc'
| make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/misc'
| make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/misc'
| make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/netem'
| make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/netem'
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007'
| /usr/bin/make -C doc all txt
| make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/doc'
| make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
| make[1]: Nothing to be done for `txt'.
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/iproute-20051007/doc'
| touch stamp-build
| dh_testdir
| dh_testroot
| dh_install --fail-missing
| cp: cannot stat `tc/tc': No such file or directory
| dh_install: command returned error code 256
| make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
| ******************************************************************************
| Build finished at 20051114-0827
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

Full build log(s): 
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?&ver=20051007-1&pkg=iproute&arch=sparc

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339119-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2006 12:50:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 28 04:50:21 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F2pU0-0004zF-2Q; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 04:47:12 -0800
From: Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#339119: fixed in iproute 20051007-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 04:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: iproute
Source-Version: 20051007-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
iproute, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

iproute-dev_20051007-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/i/iproute/iproute-dev_20051007-3_powerpc.deb
iproute_20051007-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/iproute/iproute_20051007-3.diff.gz
iproute_20051007-3.dsc
  to pool/main/i/iproute/iproute_20051007-3.dsc
iproute_20051007-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/i/iproute/iproute_20051007-3_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated iproute package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:28:39 +0100
Source: iproute
Binary: iproute-dev iproute
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 20051007-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 iproute    - Professional tools to control the networking in Linux kernels
 iproute-dev - Development package for iproute
Closes: 167314 204629 213673 296200 302589 305338 319871 326961 333643 338575 
339119 340004 347699
Changes: 
 iproute (20051007-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #333643)
   * Added a patch for tc that add u32 get parsed correct
     Thanks Russell Stuart for the patch (Closes: #347699)
   * We now have a manpage for tc-bfifo (Closes: #319871)
   * "get" is no longer mentioned in tc's usage (Closes: #167314)
   * We now build arpd (Closes: #296200)
   * Include htb docs (Closes: #204629)
   * Added flex to build-deps (Closes: #340004, #339119)
   * Added symlinks for lnstat (Closes: #302589)
   * Acknowledge heap correction nmu (Closes: #326961)
   * Acknowledge douple free fix nmu (Closes: #338575)
   * Fixed allmulticast mention in ip manpage (Closes: #305338)
   * Add [ prio NUMBER ] to ip_rule.c (Closes: #213673)
Files: 
 cdbe43c3c5bff08cc9d57eacc1609e25 742 net optional iproute_20051007-3.dsc
 645667e4d8d506feedc2f61ca8afa9f1 30534 net optional iproute_20051007-3.diff.gz
 5a11b37fa7794f578aed94e65436e74c 1061852 net optional 
iproute_20051007-3_powerpc.deb
 b942ef062fd4fef2f221d0331262f1d6 22622 libdevel optional 
iproute-dev_20051007-3_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD22Ny01u8mbx9AgoRAtevAKC5z0FHBJOBNh5cQqhkhK7gz3C9fACgifDW
R/CVyQRq2UAHM/vZ8PNJZ4Y=
=FY1q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to