Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 06:35:04 +0000
with message-id <20160629063502.gh12...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
has caused the Debian Bug report #825701,
regarding should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
825701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: osptoolkit
Version: 3.4.2-1.2
Severity: serious
This package:
* has very few users https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=osptoolkit
* one unanswered RC bug #804623
* no answer to the other bugs #555877 #786975
* actually you never bothered replying even to the closed bugs #713639
#761782
* 2 NMU
* last (AND ONLY!) maintainer upload in 2008. This is not how this is
supposed to work, sorry. Uploading a package to the archive means
committing to maintain it.
* currently it just FTBFS.
* blocking openssl decruft
Given so, I'm going to ask for removal in about one week if nobody
blocks me before.
RM: osptoolkit -- RoQA; RC-buggy; FTBFS; unmaintained
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:37:58AM +0000, 'Mattia Rizzolo' wrote:
> I'll make sure to close this bug by myself once accepted (as it has to
> go through NEW
Alright, osptoolkit has been accepted, built on all release
architecture, and is now not a blocker anymore for libssl1.0.0 decruft.
Therefore, I'm closing this bug (with the hope that the package will
start to be actually maintained from now on…).
Thank you all for the support.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
