Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:49:41 +0000
with message-id <e1b9pi5-0004e2...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#826108: fixed in ruby-base32 0.3.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #826108,
regarding ruby-base32: ships /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/version.rb
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
826108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826108
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ruby-aws
Version: 2.10.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ruby-base32 0.3.2-2
Control: retitle -2 ruby-base32: ships /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/version.rb

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.

/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/version.rb sonds like a very generic path
that probably shouldn't be shipped by any ruby extension package.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package ruby-base32.
  Preparing to unpack .../ruby-base32_0.3.2-2_all.deb ...
  Unpacking ruby-base32 (0.3.2-2) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/ruby-base32_0.3.2-2_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/version.rb', which is also in 
package ruby-aws 2.10.2-3
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/ruby-base32_0.3.2-2_all.deb


cheers,

Andreas

Attachment: ruby-aws=2.10.2-3_ruby-base32=0.3.2-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-base32
Source-Version: 0.3.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-base32, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 826...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ruby-base32 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:48:37 +0530
Source: ruby-base32
Binary: ruby-base32
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org>
Description:
 ruby-base32 - Ruby extension for base32 encoding and decoding
Closes: 826108
Changes:
 ruby-base32 (0.3.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix version.rb conflict (Closes: #826108)
Checksums-Sha1:
 64853f5f5b3ba4e3eec7a69a1c66d44fc7a5a733 2025 ruby-base32_0.3.2-3.dsc
 a4ae4d5d206e1960755a172ffa17090407898445 2504 ruby-base32_0.3.2-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 9a8307f93e930d803105ffac4157d992d73c676a92b1c8370f002fa65ee32614 2025 
ruby-base32_0.3.2-3.dsc
 cd96bed5290e1cc25611ab4304ef8d821719746b18dcb186b5c8167bd5432847 2504 
ruby-base32_0.3.2-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 fb79caef46fe055ae2883e90f9673a1d 2025 ruby optional ruby-base32_0.3.2-3.dsc
 f9539cd64ffe3b6142e7ad7bbc9fd216 2504 ruby optional 
ruby-base32_0.3.2-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2FAU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to