Control: tag 823428 pending

Hi!

Bug #823428 in package dpkg reported by you has been fixed in
the dpkg/dpkg.git Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and
you can check the diff of the fix at:

    https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=a558a21

---
commit a558a21ae7f04751f7f5dfe724cd9d5f95905734
Author: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>
Date:   Thu May 5 20:13:56 2016 +0200

    dpkg-source: Add new --require-strong-checksums option and change default
    
    Erroring out when no strong checksums are present is very harsh, as we
    do not even do something similar for invalid/unknown/expired signatures
    which means doing this for checksums has really no point.
    
    Add a new command-line option to force the behavior to be strict, and
    change to a warning.
    
    Regression introduced in commit 040973c7a1e50b78ef042ef5ffbfff0440c24700.
    
    Closes: #823428
    Reported-by: Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org>

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e70cae6..654e40f 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
 dpkg (1.18.7) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
 
   [ Guillem Jover ]
+  * Add new dpkg-source --require-strong-checksums option and change default.
+    There is no point in erroring out on this condition when signature issues
+    are only warnings, because we cannot guarantee we have functional keys
+    for old signatures. Regression introduced in dpkg 1.18.5. Closes: #823428
   * Perl modules:
     - Relax dependency restrictions parsing to allow again sloppy spaces
       around versions, architectures and profile restrictions.
       Regression introduced in 1.18.5. Closes: #823431
+    - Add new require_strong_checksums option to Dpkg::Source::Package.
   * Documentation:
     - Shorten example symbol names in dpkg-gensymbols to avoid a mandb
       warning due to unwrappable lines in translations.

Reply via email to