-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello,
I upgraded (again) because the then last package (4.0.3-p1+ds-1) was non-usable: working on this issue was then my highest priority. I thought that I could postpone this issue, but I was wrong (obviously). Whatever, I fixed by forcing a complete build. I am on my way to submit the new package *4.0.3-p1+ds-2). Cheers, Jerome On 29/04/16 10:36, Santiago Vila wrote: > severity 806108 important > thanks > > Hi. I *really* appreciate that you consider this has a greater severity > than "important", but I prefer to keep it important for two reasons: > > * I don't have the "blessing" (so to speak) from the release managers > to make these bugs RC yet. > > * If this is serious, all the other similar bugs should be serious too. > Here is the complete list of similar bugs: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=binary-indep;users=sanv...@debian.org > > > Well, those are my reasons, but of course if you insist that this must > be serious, go ahead. I promise that I will not downgrade it again, > otherwise it would be a very odd severity war indeed: Maintainer > raises severity and reporter downgrades it :-) > > Thanks. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXI3s2AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4FEIALt14ADF/mlQyyBashkqeRi+ DANq2IiGX98MkbXpZiZI6EJG1GBZJcifx+1Pqfk8ht8Vk+ZYqreCCymzR4ukw2dY 4Mia1+CqtrhgnQ3z3nbm5kmTXN13jDwinK9mawycvWYVOW6hlbaYw1XHqWO4WAfr a42bhLhqXVrIVN2OBe3NZfl/QImzRb1+H3B3ydyr71V1A7O0VLUC74qA4kvr81d2 +EJfkaHvzSgk7RYPqjuba5YgQzWMW7zMafOy1DMOqpWECcjoSwr8mXMkk1Q2qmno uAPriagKIpV+M2zBJN9XxReQlnTqjjP0Ni2Emdwk0PK2w2bTHKVVER9au5/x0Gc= =rWFS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
