Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346608: fixed in advi 1.6.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:01 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Evlyz-0000lH-K1
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:01 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
          id 1Evlyy-0006i4-FJ
          for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:00 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: advi: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:00 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: advi
Version: 1.6.0-6
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

    [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

    [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

    [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

    [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346608-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2006 22:23:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 14:23:27 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F19lL-000251-MO; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:02:11 -0800
From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346608: fixed in advi 1.6.0-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:02:11 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: advi
Source-Version: 1.6.0-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
advi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

advi-examples_1.6.0-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/advi/advi-examples_1.6.0-7_all.deb
advi_1.6.0-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.6.0-7.diff.gz
advi_1.6.0-7.dsc
  to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.6.0-7.dsc
advi_1.6.0-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.6.0-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated advi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:07:38 +0100
Source: advi
Binary: advi advi-examples
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.6.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 advi       - an active DVI previewer and presenter
 advi-examples - example presentations for Active-DVI (advi)
Closes: 346608
Changes: 
 advi (1.6.0-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Rebuild for ocaml 3.09.1.
   * Don't build-dep on xlibs-dev, use x-dev, libx11-dev and libxinerama-dev
     instead (Closes: #346608).
   * Add myself and Samuel Mimram to Uploaders.
   * Update to CVS HEAD as of 20060103, and rediff existing patches.
   * Updated standards version to 3.6.2, no changes needed.
Files: 
 8a3444a775e80ad417eabd7b6fc34bf3 1129 tex optional advi_1.6.0-7.dsc
 d3cb47313f867e0e41023a7d8fad5270 49840 tex optional advi_1.6.0-7.diff.gz
 02095026dd2f9d510afba65c43286b0d 4138368 tex optional 
advi-examples_1.6.0-7_all.deb
 00ea2686913dbac30007644befea2be0 641740 tex optional advi_1.6.0-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD1T21Iae1O4AJae8RAmUHAJ9W9VHkDii8uPRuCzJNtM8y1/6D2wCfbGSs
J+/MzfKLMzLpxc13k7ywqlw=
=hvXn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to