A patch is coming soon ... On 2016-04-11 09:29, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > OK, but as you suspect this may build next time and so on, then it > will just break again. Well, maybe the 'ls' calls will make it work, > due to the extra time it needs to execute those. But then I can add > 'sleep 1' between the 'make' calls.
The ls was primarily meant to collect the timestamps, which I managed to reproduce in the make bug. Andreas
