On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 15:30 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Package: ufw > Version: 0.34-2 > Severity: serious > > Configuration files written by the ufw command (user.rules, > user6.rules) must be stored in either /etc (if they are also intended > to be directly editable) or /var. > > I spent quite some time trying to understand how to transfer my ufw > configuration to a new installation; following the FHS would have > saved me that. > Sorry about that. Actually this has been discussed at great length in the upstream bug. Here has been my historical take: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufw/+bug/728128/comments/1
That said with 0.35 I finally yielded: ufw (0.35) RELEASED; urgency=medium ... * move user[6].rules to /etc/ufw (LP: #728128) In other words, this will be fixed in 0.35-1. > Ben. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: stretch/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages ufw depends on: > ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.59 > ii init-system-helpers 1.29 > ii iptables 1.6.0-2 > ii python3 3.5.1-2 > pn python3:any <none> > ii ucf 3.0035 > > ufw recommends no packages. > > Versions of packages ufw suggests: > ii rsyslog 8.16.0-1 > > -- debconf information excluded -- Jamie Strandboge | http://www.canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
