Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:39:05 +0100
with message-id <20160312133905.gb17...@aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#812406: usb: Strange USB bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #812406,
regarding usb: Strange USB bugs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
812406: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812406
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libusb-1.0-0
Version: 2:1.0.20-1
Severity: critical
File: usb
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes serious data loss

One PC sees only 10 MiB on my JetFlash Transcend USB and NTFS partition. Second 
PC (this) sees ~16 GiB and Mac & EFI partitions. But all statements are false: 
i don't have Windows, i don't have Mac, size of USB - 4 GiB. Also, sometimes, 
sector size from kernel does not matches sector size from usb driver. Can you 
fix it, maintainer?

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libusb-1.0-0:i386 depends on:
ii  libc6     2.21-6
ii  libudev1  228-4

libusb-1.0-0:i386 recommends no packages.

libusb-1.0-0:i386 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-03-07 15:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-01-23 23:56, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > control: tag -1 + moreinfo
> > control: tag -1 - upstream
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 2016-01-23 15:05, Nickolay Ilyushin wrote:
> > > Package: libusb-1.0-0
> > > Version: 2:1.0.20-1
> > > Severity: critical
> > > File: usb
> > > Tags: upstream
> > > Justification: causes serious data loss
> > 
> > It is not clear from your description how you have lost data. Can you
> > please give us more details?
> > 
> > > One PC sees only 10 MiB on my JetFlash Transcend USB and NTFS partition. 
> > > Second PC (this) sees ~16 GiB and Mac & EFI partitions. But all 
> > > statements are false: i don't have Windows, i don't have Mac, size of USB 
> > > - 4 GiB. Also, sometimes, sector size from kernel does not matches sector 
> > > size from usb driver. Can you fix it, maintainer?
> > 
> > This is not clear from your description where you "see" the wrong
> > information. Without more details like for example the name of your
> > desktop environment or a screenshot it would be difficult to get your
> > problem fixed.
> > 
> > Also please note that libusb has nothing to do with USB flash disk, so
> > the bug is likely reported against the wrong package.
> 
> Any news about this, can you please give us more details about the
> issue?

This is clearly not a libusb bug, and I got no news from the submitter.
I am therefore closing the bug.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to