Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:47:41 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346858: fixed in xtide 2.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:37 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm0V-0001QA-VI
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:36 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Evlzx-00076R-Vx
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:02 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xtide: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:01 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xtide
Version: 2.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
source.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
affected packages can be found here [4].
[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
their upload.
Thanks for your collaboration!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346858-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 03:50:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 19:50:44 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1F09j3-000199-J6; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:47:41 -0800
From: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346858: fixed in xtide 2.8.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:47:41 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xtide
Source-Version: 2.8.2-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xtide, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xtide_2.8.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xtide/xtide_2.8.2-2.diff.gz
xtide_2.8.2-2.dsc
to pool/main/x/xtide/xtide_2.8.2-2.dsc
xtide_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xtide/xtide_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xtide package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:29:41 -0500
Source: xtide
Binary: xtide
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.8.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xtide - provides tide and current predictions
Closes: 346858
Changes:
xtide (2.8.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bug fix: "xtide: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev", thanks to
Adeodato Simó for reporting it (Closes: #346858). Builds in a chroot
simply without xlibs-dev, so removing libx11-dev, libxpm-dev,
libxt-dev and x-dev.
Files:
cf4f438039f44954362580a77f4ab8f0 689 science optional xtide_2.8.2-2.dsc
25e6693a4c442b04f57a374348c074ed 53111 science optional xtide_2.8.2-2.diff.gz
e1e9140f37e807a92e92b0470ee7097b 905806 science optional xtide_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQ9Gr1LwVH8jSqROhAQJ6KwP+KtLHHF4QuX572sJ4rMpfXcBYMF7wfQd5
risSyqFBRARiXzPGyW1ntBRa+6LKxV7JA6zfd/jvslMJ1WrXYwIwDcFNKNPfObGb
F+bTufro1lcyFGOHhesm/6OcsCrPQgcCK8F4az9+exmpYfpUQzwSMqDTaJN1q7y0
qISIva9eoyo=
=DJ6p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
