On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 08:16:47AM +0530, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Moritz Muehlenhoff (2016-01-31 04:00:28)
> > Should sugar-record-activity be removed? It depends on gstreamer,
> > which is scheduled for removal and there doesn't seem to be any
> > upstream activity to port it to modern gstreamer.
> >
> > Please address the outstanding bugs or reassign this to ftp.debian.org
> > for removal.
>
> Thanks for the concern. Upstream is quite slow but not dead, so I will
> keep waiting.
Ok. Since there's now only a handful of packages left using gstreamer 0.10
I will file removal bugs for it and the remaining reverse deps in 3-4 weeks.
If sugar-record-activity can't be updated in time, it can easily re-enter
the archive after it has been ported to gstreamer 1.0.
Cheers,
Moritz
