-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi,
Ok, the libboost1.58-dev is not needed if boost-dev makes it into testing; I just included it to get the pkg to build, boost1.55 FTBFS at the moment. A decision from the Boost team on which Boost is going to stretch is desirable. regards Alastair On 07/02/2016 19:58, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> - libboost-dev (>= 1.53.1), libboost-mpi-dev, dh-autoreconf, >> + libboost1.58-dev, libboost1.58-mpi-devm dh-autoreconf, > > This looks rather scary to me. > > Since libboost-dev (currently) directly depends on libboost1.58-dev, > there is no need to replace the dependency on libboost-dev with > libboost1.58-dev. > > In contrary: It would make very future boost transition rather awkward > and would make additional source-ful uploads necessary. So I strongly > recommend to _not_ apply that part of the patch as it makes things > worse. > > Regards, Axel - -- Alastair McKinstry, <alast...@sceal.ie>, <mckins...@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWuJL4AAoJEMvmu05dmtOlSrcP/1t4sDsBxboZOqQWYFXk+sX3 7t/c2lemKc5n3gNLBGXRct6izgWk3f9Zc6sGjLSw5J0ShofvTFMs7sbbp8H8dEZy CVLPrc7n8Z2nhejE8KFxzJHbOXfXi/dgAQUyrDPQfxIELN8SgYczmaQNtMwPPkmE isFvlYLQni9oU773fAAOZYiwcIHR6sotNvJP7khPCbjwrJNoNcqDGB//XhLmzQu9 zMqUlsM6rWvw1/4cw1CYbGmZL9Z2Dltr6Dqc4yfQ7J+RKI3YTparIy6/X22GTtjF oxJl1tZA+hOW9cX/xcyIFUIazksaQJM7/FbBdZx3OzIqlq64sSAeBHMMrpguneUW f107d5xhd6Yxl3JzD0TH9Ua9yTzg+HMTOnh/O3kruO7sTKZfwo6ZVvseSeFbkwP+ k4COpD30nkei156UkSQADp3CASHJ1DGoy7j7jWQc35HpB7FH91Y8JXzHLOMz4UUG sH7zY6n9/G7j4RTS90N8bMZRTsXJTPcXHWOoBvaPyO4oc8Ps5t0qzadRZqJRJgay /hEi21jXBVlkr0xVCUZOLRfUmvFakbhkIcptKlbxutR19xf/0v2mNY5t+hrOdTFa KVrTW0jsyb3/ce3W5Rx1+N99SmTaBVhK7IUYKPgckVg0omRSpD8iIDeRpAb32Dqn McIK9vfzw6oAeDV2U213 =sVD5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
