Control: tags 813256 + pending
Dear Manoj,
I've prepared an NMU for flex (versioned as 2.6.0-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -u flex-2.6.0/debian/changelog flex-2.6.0/debian/changelog
--- flex-2.6.0/debian/changelog
+++ flex-2.6.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+flex (2.6.0-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Comments in C style in skeleton.
+ Fixes "flex: C++ style comment in C output".
+ Thanks to Tim R??hsen <tim.rueh...@gmx.de> (Closes: #813256)
+
+ -- Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:14:07 +0100
+
flex (2.6.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Revert the help2man fix; it was creating errors in the diff.gz
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- flex-2.6.0.orig/src/flex.skl
+++ flex-2.6.0/src/flex.skl
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@
* scanner will even need a stack. We use 2 instead of 1 to avoid an
* immediate realloc on the next call.
*/
- num_to_alloc = 1; // After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways...
+ num_to_alloc = 1; /* After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways... */
YY_G(yy_buffer_stack) = (struct yy_buffer_state**)yyalloc
(num_to_alloc * sizeof(struct yy_buffer_state*)
M4_YY_CALL_LAST_ARG);
