Hello again. On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:07:03PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: [...] > There's one question on my mind though, shouldn't the upgrade case > be versioned? eg. so in additional future releases you don't try to > divert when you've already diverted. You only want the diversion to > happen once when upgrading to this exact version you're preparing now.
One minor correction, we should ofcourse not check which version we're upgrading *to*. The check should be if we're upgrading *from* a version << $FIRSTFIXED~. I think the example in policy has this right so check that out instead of listening to me. ;) Regards, Andreas Henriksson
