Le dimanche 10 janvier 2016 à 10:31 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : > On 10 January 2016 at 17:09, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > Yes I had the time to look at it. It's indeed a compiler issue. The > > problem goes away if one compiles with GCC 4.9 (I could not give a > > try > > to GCC 6, which is not yet compiled in experimental for mips). > > Right. > > What a pain. This may throw in wrench into some of the g++-5 > transition.
I tried with the combination of gcc-4.9 and g++-5. So I think this change does not interfere with the g++-5 transition. > > By the way, we should enable back optimization on mips (and > > mipsel). > > There seem to be no point of turning it off (I verified that R > > compiles > > with GCC 5 + optimization on mipsel). > > Sure. [ I presume you meant gcc 4.9 with optimization. ] Sorry, I meant gcc-4.9 + optimization on mips, and gcc-5 + optimization on mipsel. > > Then we should report the issue in GCC 5. I have a rather minimal > > testcase. > > Great. I reported a few to doku, but he is quite swamped with all > this, and I > presume upstream drowns as well. I wonder if our mips porters have > contacts? My plan is to report it directly to upstream, and maybe in Debian as well with a link to the upstream bug report. -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://sebastien.villemot.name `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
