Hi Andreas.
I've uploaded the proposed patch as non-NMU. Do you want me to approach
release team or are you just a member and will take over from here?
Kind regards and thanks for pushing ;-)
Andreas.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:22:57PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-12-09 17:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > hmmm, I wonder in how far a lob popcon non-free package is relevant for
> > Jessie point releases. IMHO this creates more work for all involved
> > parties than it is worth the issue. Please correct me if I'm wrong and
> > I'll do what needs to be done.
>
> So far the SRM accepted fixes for FTBFS(-like) bugs in jessie (or the
> non-free appendix to jessie) without questioning.
> If we consider some packages not worth fixing RC bugs in stable, perhaps
> they shouldn't have been part of stable (or stable/non-free) in the
> first place?
> Yes, it's a trivial fix and probably noone will run into the problem in
> real world setups, but where should the line be drawn?
>
> Andreas
--
http://fam-tille.de
