On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:17:44PM +0000, Steve Hay via perl5-porters wrote: > >> ***Please, please, please*** test your code against perl-5.22.1-RC3. >> This is your last chance to point out any critical regressions before >> v5.22.1 ships "for real," and we'd rather fix things for v5.22.1 than >> for v5.22.2! > > Hi, we're seeing t/op/sprintf2.t failures on Debian powerpc and ppc64. > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=powerpc&ver=5.22.1~rc3-1&stamp=1449230321 > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=ppc64&ver=5.22.1~rc3-1&stamp=1449231009 > > I've reproduced these with the pristine 5.22.1-RC3 (no Debian > modifications) and just './Configure -des'. (Please ignore the 'Commit > id' below, it comes from our separate git repo.) > > t/op/sprintf2 ................................................. # Failed test > 1463 - at op/sprintf2.t line 671 > # got '0x1p+1020 > # ' > # expected /(?^:^0x1.0{522}1p\+1020$)/ > # Failed test 1464 - at op/sprintf2.t line 673 > # got '0x1p+1021 > # ' > # expected /(?^:^0x1.0{523}8p\+1021$)/ > # Failed test 1465 - at op/sprintf2.t line 675 > # got '0x1p+1022 > # ' > # expected /(?^:^0x1.0{523}4p\+1022$)/ > # Failed test 1466 - at op/sprintf2.t line 677 > # got '0x1p+1023 > # ' > # expected /(?^:^0x1.0{523}2p\+1023$)/ > # Failed test 1467 - at op/sprintf2.t line 679 > # got '0x1p+1023 > # ' > # expected /(?^:^0x1.0{523}1p\+1023$)/ > # Failed test 1468 - at op/sprintf2.t line 681 > # got '0x1p+1023 > # ' > # expected /(?^:^0x1.0{524}8p\+1023$)/ > FAILED at test 1463
FWIW, on Darwin PPC these tests are skipped: ok 1463 # skip darwin doublekind=4 ok 1464 # skip darwin doublekind=4 ok 1465 # skip darwin doublekind=4 ok 1466 # skip darwin doublekind=4 ok 1467 # skip darwin doublekind=4 ok 1468 # skip darwin doublekind=4 What does Debian PPC show for: % ./perl -Ilib -V:doublekind doublekind='4'; ?
