Hi Dirk, On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:26:29 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > Package: ruby-gsl > Severity: serious > > The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had > a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous > (1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because > such a transition was never needed. But this warranted a change. > > Your package as a versioned 'Depends: libgsl0ldbl (>= 1.X)' for some value of > X which cannot be satisfied by the Provides: we added to libgsl2. So this > requires a rebuild of your package against libgsl-dev (>= 2.0). > > If you have any questions please do not hesitate to get in touch. The release > team has also been exceptional on this (as usual, they do rock) so see > > http://bugs.debian.org/804246 > > which tracks the transition bug report against release. > > Regards, Dirk > > [1] http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8392 Thank you for the bug report. I have prepared the fix in git [2] but tamuanova [3] needs to be transitioned first since it is a build dependency and can't be installed together with libgsl-dev > 2.0.
Cheers, Balint [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-gsl.git/commit/?id=126c49a55a83dda1a39e0e25b11529020bd0ee74 [3] https://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tamuanova.html
