Hendrik Tews <hend...@askra.de> writes: > it's a pattern matching failure in tag_module_type, which means > the file stdLabels.mli contains some module type that I didn't > know about when I wrote tag_module_type.
The issue is presumably stdLabels.mli's use of module aliases, which are new in OCaml 4.02.x. > If somebody could send me that stdLabels.mli (or include it here > in the bug report) I will try to take a look. http://caml.inria.fr/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/ocaml/release/4.02.3/stdlib/stdLabels.mli?revision=16239&view=markup The non-comment lines are simply module Array = ArrayLabels module Bytes = BytesLabels module List = ListLabels module String = StringLabels > (When I wrote otags, I explicitly avoided catch-all clauses. This Fair enough. Thanks for writing otags, and for looking into this report! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
