On 11/05/2015 11:26 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >> I see that you only have wine64, but not wine32 installed. Is this a >> result of the current issue, or did you really use Wine without the >> 32-bit packages installed previously? I was under the impression that a >> 64-bit only setup has no *real* use case and may fail. > > Well, it is the result of the issue. But I don't use wine32 that much. I > only use wine64 playing WoW (The only usecase for me :-D). That works > well. Unfortunatelly for updates that doesn't as it battlenet is 32bit > only.
But you had it installed, so you would have the manpages installed with my proposed fix. Re 64-bit-only installs: I digged that up and they are indeed not supported by upstream. *Not* installing the recommended wine32-package (with the manpages) is considered advanced and done on purpose (=don't complain if something doesn't work, or if the manpages are missing). >> All in all I'd still go with my committed fix (move manpages to wine32), >> but I'd be less happy with it. > > If the man pages do the trouble, why not splitting out them to a -doc > package? That would be the cleanest way. Unfortunately no, they are only built on 32-bit arches now. So unless we change the buildsystem they are just not available from 64-bit builds. So a -doc package doesn't help here. Greets! jre
