Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:16:44 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348304: bzip2: upgrade fails with "'Index' value missing"
error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2006 08:00:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 00:00:05 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pc-4082.ethz.ch
([129.132.119.169] helo=komsys-pc-ruf.ethz.ch ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EyPHY-0003qn-SW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:05 -0800
Received: by komsys-pc-ruf.ethz.ch (Postfix, from userid 9258)
id A251D1FED9; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:00:01 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bzip2: upgrade fails with "'Index' value missing" error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:00:01 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: bzip2
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Here comes the log:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up bzip2 (1.0.3-1) ...
error in control file: `Index' value missing for type HTML at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 641, <IN> line 13.
dpkg: error processing bzip2 (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
bzip2
localepurge: checking system for new locale ...
localepurge: processing locale files ...
localepurge: processing man pages ...
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-SR-ruf.v1
Locale: LANG=en_IE, LC_CTYPE=en_IE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages bzip2 depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-1 high-quality block-sorting file co
bzip2 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 348304-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2006 08:17:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 00:17:21 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-60-224-185-87.vic.bigpond.net.au ([60.224.185.87]
helo=nukak.apana.org.au)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EyPYH-00029M-6g
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:17:21 -0800
Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DA8EE6843B7; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:16:44 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:16:44 +1100
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#348304: bzip2: upgrade fails with "'Index' value missing" error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 1.0.3-2
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
>Package: bzip2
>Version: 1.0.3-1
>Severity: grave
>Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
>Here comes the log:
>
>Reading package lists... Done
>Building dependency tree... Done
>0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded.
>1 not fully installed or removed.
>Need to get 0B of archives.
>After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
>Setting up bzip2 (1.0.3-1) ...
>error in control file: `Index' value missing for type HTML at /usr/sbin/=
install-docs line 641, <IN> line 13.
>dpkg: error processing bzip2 (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
>Errors were encountered while processing:
> bzip2
>localepurge: checking system for new locale ...
>localepurge: processing locale files ...
>localepurge: processing man pages ...
>E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
>
>-- System Information:
>Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers proposed-updates
> APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
>Architecture: i386 (i686)
>Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-SR-ruf.v1
>Locale: LANG=3Den_IE, LC_CTYPE=3Den_IE (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)
>
>Versions of packages bzip2 depends on:
>ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-1 high-quality block-sorting =
file co
>
>bzip2 recommends no packages.
>
>-- no debconf information
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:37:38 +1100
Source: bzip2
Binary: lib32bz2-dev libbz2-1.0 lib64bz2-1.0 lib32bz2-1.0 bzip2 libbz2-de=
v lib64bz2-dev
Architecture: source i386 alpha sparc
Version: 1.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:=20
bzip2 - high-quality block-sorting file compressor - utilities
lib64bz2-1.0 - high-quality block-sorting file compressor library - 64bi=
t runtim
lib64bz2-dev - high-quality block-sorting file compressor library - 64bi=
t develo
libbz2-1.0 - high-quality block-sorting file compressor library - runtim=
e
libbz2-dev - high-quality block-sorting file compressor library - develo=
pment
Closes: 348266
Changes:=20
bzip2 (1.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
.
* Fixed "upgrading fails", closes: #348266. Patches by Paul Brook
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* Replaces amd64-libs and amd64-libs-dev versions << 1.5.
Files:=20
3722f795434ad0e99f1738d5a15286af 897 utils important bzip2_1.0.3-2.dsc
f919e8855bead06234f56a8ec386ad36 71598 utils important bzip2_1.0.3-2.dif=
f.gz
bb6f9255c4570c02323d08327d085c0a 44016 libs important libbz2-1.0_1.0.3-2=
_i386.deb
45da3029f9836ba491557cc0f875d78a 33992 libdevel optional libbz2-dev_1.0.=
3-2_i386.deb
2444c79af0218e594a69337990f77115 266088 utils optional bzip2_1.0.3-2_i38=
6.deb
32c84c8c9a04b30ec5f8bbdcd1853173 35514 libs optional lib64bz2-1.0_1.0.3-=
2_i386.deb
4dd68f918c1a90c5a11b5c404b82234e 29340 libdevel optional lib64bz2-dev_1.=
0.3-2_i386.deb
e2423e5b148cd650835fcbfa37fb232b 40460 libs important libbz2-1.0_1.0.3-2=
_sparc.deb
5b7c064a1b3881811fe39bb66229adcd 32046 libdevel optional libbz2-dev_1.0.=
3-2_sparc.deb
3424b25b79158680818d9ff947bf0872 266524 utils optional bzip2_1.0.3-2_spa=
rc.deb
b50a4a2519824d1b3707ae757c63a74b 37414 libs optional lib64bz2-1.0_1.0.3-=
2_sparc.deb
e2b75623199c1f84c6e4f12e8bc58a00 31366 libdevel optional lib64bz2-dev_1.=
0.3-2_sparc.deb
4d1124aab5a85a89d05d188d9418e52a 47502 libs important libbz2-1.0_1.0.3-2=
_alpha.deb
6192b52441d21833c85bd5c5ed2dcde2 40604 libdevel optional libbz2-dev_1.0.=
3-2_alpha.deb
63005b03b618596a0a66abc43319337c 269672 utils optional bzip2_1.0.3-2_alp=
ha.deb
An=EDbal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- http://v7w.com/anibal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
