Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:49:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348198: Segfaults with Microdia Meade ETX-105EC Camera.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2006 16:18:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 08:18:56 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wp050.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.57])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EyAam-0006kU-49
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 08:18:56 -0800
Received: by wp050.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.43 using esmtpsa 
(TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
        from p54995a35.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.153.90.53] helo=aragorn)
        id 1EyAaG-0007De-FO; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:18:24 +0100
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:18:23 +0100
From: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Segfaults with Microdia Meade ETX-105EC Camera.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,X_DEBBUGS_CC 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI"
Content-Disposition: inline


--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: sonic-snap
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch

Hi,

I tried sonic-snap with my tiny, cheap webcam and it segfaulted.

Attached is a patch which fixes my problem.

More info:

 * > sonic-snap-gui=20
Clock resolution is 999848 nanoseconds
Control red balance (0x98090e)
min=3D0, max=3D63, default=3D0
Control blue balance (0x98090f)
min=3D0, max=3D63, default=3D32
Control exposure (0x980911)
min=3D592, max=3D65535, default=3D592
sonic-snap-gui: controls.cxx:93: int controls_get_max_gain(int):
Assertion `!rv' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

 * lsusb: Bus 003 Device 006: ID 0c45:602a Microdia Meade ETX-105EC Camera

 * Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.4 using the sn9c102 driver as a module


HTH, Uwe.
--=20
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.hermann-uwe.de                 | http://www.crazy-hacks.org
http://www.it-services-uh.de              | http://www.phpmeat.org
http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org | http://www.holsham-traders.de

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="webcam.patch"

--- controls.cxx        2006-01-15 17:10:48.000000000 +0100
+++ controls.patched.cxx        2006-01-15 17:10:29.000000000 +0100
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int controls_get_max_gain(int fd)
   memset (&queryctrl, 0, sizeof (queryctrl));
   queryctrl.id = V4L2_CID_GAIN;
   int rv=ioctl(fd, VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL, &queryctrl);
-  assert(!rv);
+  // assert(!rv);
   assert(!(queryctrl.flags & V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_DISABLED));
   return queryctrl.maximum;
 }

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--

--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDynXPXdVoV3jWIbQRAg6rAJ9mda/XIVEGyxVDW7MIlQNwH55mDgCfY42D
A0BZPIpJKkXb72oqi3qAWh4=
=0CDN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 348198-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2006 01:49:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 17:49:07 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wp050.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.57])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EyJUZ-0000Zs-Kr
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:49:07 -0800
Received: by wp050.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.43 using esmtpsa 
(TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
        from dslb-084-056-013-040.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.56.13.40] 
helo=aragorn)
        id 1EyJUU-00021S-SQ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:49:03 +0100
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:49:02 +0100
From: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#348198: Segfaults with Microdia Meade ETX-105EC Camera.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Martin,

On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 05:03:09PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-15 17:18]:
> > Package: sonic-snap
>=20
> There's no such package in Debian.  What does
>     dpkg -p sonic-snap | grep Maintainer
> say?

Oh man, I'm getting old. I downloaded and installed the deb from
  http://www.stolk.org/sonic-snap/
then noticed the bug, fixed the bug, and then ran "reportbug sonic-snap",
which - of course - generated a bogus bug (closing now).

I'll email the patch to the author and/or ITP the package, I guess.


Thanks for your email, Uwe.
--=20
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.hermann-uwe.de                 | http://www.crazy-hacks.org
http://www.it-services-uh.de              | http://www.phpmeat.org
http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org | http://www.holsham-traders.de

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDyvuOXdVoV3jWIbQRAlKOAKCCHngMs/LgQQr0RSHLK8sYN8oM+wCgl2XP
zHNRRA5AckUpJXhoXqewbt0=
=NMBS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to